This is a really big place. And really big doesn't even come close to a realistic description. Following our stay in Kakadu and Darwin, we were on to Alice Springs, Kings Canyon, and Uluru. THe flight was two hours and 20 minutes to Alice, and yet we didn't even leave the "state" we were in, the Northern Territory. Our accommodations in Kings Canyon for the few days were pretty lackluster, even mice infested in some areas. However, four of the thirty of us were randomly chosen due to insufficient cabin capacity to be upgraded to the Holiday Inn-style rooms in another area of the Kings Canyon Resort with our own double beds and bathrooms. I was one of the lucky ones in that boat.
But regardless of room quality, we were still no more than 200 kilometers from the geographic center of Australia, which meant one thing- we were in the middle of nowhere. There are innumerable "middle of nowhere" places in Australia, because most people live on the coast. For example, Alice Springs is the second largest "city" in the Northern Territory, home to a whopping 17,000 people. There are around 21 million people here total, in a country geographically larger than the United States. Clearly, Australian very sparsely inhabit their country's interior.
Living in the middle of nowhere means you have to deal with some things, such as no internet in most areas and limited phone reception. It's like camping, except you don't leave. Electrical power is driven by solar paneling and a generator on the edge of town. Gas was 50 cents more per liter than it was in Darwin, and packaged lunch meat was $55 per kilogram.
Yet, people still live here. And I could see why- the landscape is incredible, shown through Kings Canyon, Uluru, and Kata Tjuta. But these people were different than the Darwin crowd, for sure. Still inhabited partially by tourists, the Australian mentality here was entirely different- survival. I(n the summer it can get up to 130 degrees Fahrenheit, while in the winter the temperature can drop below freezing. There is definitely little intermixing between tourists and locals in Alice and Kings Canyon, unlike in Darwin. I'd venture to say that this van mainly be attributed to the aspirations of tourists, which is to find interesting places. Locals don't always go looking for those sort of places, like Uluru. The town of Darwin is interesting so there is mixing, while in Alice the landscape is interesting. While the view towards American tourists is still favorable, there is not nearly as much of an American culture our tourism industry in Alice and the surrounding area.
The most interesting cultural difference between central Australia and Darwin was in Uluru and Kata Tjuta. Basically, there is a board of directors of sorts that oversees decisions regarding tourism and construction in the immediate area. Eight of the members are Aborigines, while four are white Australians. There is much more of a racially intermixed community in these places, while in Darwin the Aborigines definitely stay together. Aborigines own houses next door to Australians, and seem to be more highly respected. Interesting fact- Aborigines actually didn't have rights until the 1960s or so, and were regarded as part of the landscape, like animals and wildlife. That's why in places like Darwin, like I said in a previous post, that there were different rules about harming Aborigines versus Australians. Relations have definitely improved much more in central Australia than in Darwin. Uluru and Kata Tjuta, in a sense, define the cultural significance of the Aboriginal culture to the white Australians and help put them in their place- as inhabitants of a country that is Aboriginal land.
Enough of the rock art, though- I'm in Sydney now, and its a pretty happening place. Tonight I'm taking a trip to the Opera House to see the theater production Faustus. Next post, Sydney.